WinonaWorkForceCenter

LINKS

April 2007

The New Minnesota Job Bank (MJB)

  Director's Insight A  Bonnie Elsey            March 1, 2007     Volume 1, Issue 3                       Workforce  Development Division from Director                                      

The final development stages of the new Minnesota Job Bank (MJB) are underway, and it's time to get excited about the launch of this powerful new recruiting system.  According to our current projections, testing of the new MJB will began in mid April, and the system will go live in June.

For those of you who use MJB, the new MJB will be a real treat for you.  We absolutely had to improve the match between job seekers and employers, and needed to utilize technology that can do this automatically. Today’s technology allows us to make better matches on multiple criteria at one time.  We also needed to make it easier for employers to post job orders and for job seekers to post resumes. 

DEED had an ambitious list of improvements, and we selected a product called LENS™ to be the "match engine" for the new MJB.  Developed by a California company called Burning Glass, LENS™ is a state-of-the-art tool for matching resumes and job orders.

LENS™ is an "intelligent" search engine that does more than match key words but searches in context with multiple criteria to find the best candidates.  For example, when an employer views a list of matched resumes, LENS™ ranks the resumes in order of most to least qualified.  It also uses its “intelligence” to automatically code job orders and resumes, saving staff time and increasing accuracy while allowing for better labor market information. 

One of the most exciting features of LENS™ is its ability to identify alternative careers for job seekers by "reading" the resume and suggesting other careers!  Rather than looking only at skills, LENS™ analyzes complex behavioral patterns in resumes, and uses those patterns to build predictive models for employment.  LENS can find job openings that require similar skills, job openings that resemble the candidate’s most recent job, and job openings that others with similar career paths have successfully migrated to.  This will be an outstanding tool for our job seeking customers.

In addition to these new features, the new MJB will be easier to use for employers and job seekers.  The system is intuitive, and will offer help at the point of need. The process for entering and editing resumes and job orders has been shortened and simplified.  Job orders and resumes can be easily uploaded into the system so less time is spent on manually entering data.

DEED’s goal is to make MJB the primary recruiting service in Minnesota for employers and government and could increase employee retention by providing better candidates.  Job seekers will be delighted to find job opportunities they may not have considered.

What a premier tool for citizens of Minnesota!

You don’t have to wait much longer! 

New Online Resource Offers 'Just-in-Time' Solutions to Help Start-ups Take Off, Growing Companies to Soar

Biz Info Library is the source for best practice articles and
practical, proven small business/entrepreneur solutions

ST. PAUL, MINN. - February 23, 2007 - Tired of search engines returning millions of results on business terms such as "cash flow" or "marketing?" Small businesses and entrepreneurs now have a solution. A powerful new online resource, the Biz Info Library (www.bizinfolibrary.org), provides immediate access to reliable expert information, ideas and insights on owning, operating, and growing a company.

Launched on Feb. 27 during national EntrepreneurshipWeek USA, the Biz Info Library is an online collection of articles featuring practical, results-focused information. Along with some of the top publishers on small business and entrepreneurial success, content providers include world-renowned authors and leading business experts.

"There's too much information about entrepreneurship out there, so it's difficult and time-consuming to determine what, and who to believe," said venture capitalist and blogger Guy Kawasaki, author of the best-selling "The Art of the Start" and an article contributor to the Biz Info Library. "What's needed is a vertical search engine for entrepreneurs and The Biz Info Library delivers on this need."

Biz Info Library eliminates frustrating online searches that produce thousands and sometimes millions of results. Users can quickly find relevant information by using either a keyword search, an advanced search, or by reviewing all articles in a particular category and subcategory.

Biz Info Library provides specific, just-in-time information that guides problem-solving and decision-making day-to-day and long term. Users can quickly find specific information and practical business solutions related to their current business issues. Users can download articles, and can even save articles online to create a custom library.

"As a small business owner, you're expected to be an expert on everything from your product or service to human resources, marketing and finance," said New York Times #1 best selling business author, world-famous speaker, and Biz Info Library content contributor Harvey Mackay. "The Biz Info Library is the go-to resource for practical solutions and applicable strategies for individuals and organizations seeking to be winners in an ever-changing, always competitive marketplace."

"One of the challenges small businesses face is finding information on topics such as marketing," added Sabrina Parsons, director of marketing at Palo Alto Software, the world's premier business planning software company and a Biz Info Library article contributor. "The Biz Info Library solves that problem and helps people get the information they need to make immediate and valuable improvements in their business."

Biz Info Library's extensive collection of articles and information are not easily accessible or available anywhere else. Each day Biz Info Library's experienced editors add content reviewed by expert advisors at the James J. Hill Reference Library to ensure accuracy and timeliness. The Hill Library is considered the nation's premier source for publicly accessible practical business information, and the Biz Info Library is built on the Hill Library's proprietary content management technology platform.

"In a traditional library, you don't get every book ever written about a specific topic," said Hill Library president Sam Richter. "Rather, you get the best of the best as reviewed and selected by a professional. If you use the Biz Info Library, you'll save a tremendous amount of time, and you'll get only the best business information as written by proven business experts."

Biz Info Library is a collaborative effort of three leading not-for-profit organizations whose missions emphasize support for entrepreneurship and small business: The James J. Hill Reference Library, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and the Edward Lowe Foundation. Administered by the Hill Library, Biz Info Library is free to all users. Sponsorships and custom-branded versions of the Biz Info Library are available.

◊◊◊◊◊

About The James J. Hill Reference Library

Founded in 1921, The James J. Hill Library is a non-profit, private business research organization, located in St. Paul, Minn. It is considered the nation's premier source for publicly accessible practical business information. Through its walk-in service, online products, educational programs and professional services, the Hill Library helps people achieve their business dreams by providing access to the best informational resources and expert reference assistance. For more information, visit www.jjhill.org.

About the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation

The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City is a private, nonpartisan foundation that works with partners to advance entrepreneurship in America and improve the education of children and youth. The Kauffman Foundation was established in the mid-1960s by the late entrepreneur and philanthropist Ewing Kauffman. Information about the Kauffman Foundation is available at www.kauffman.org.

About the Edward Lowe Foundation

Edward and Darlene Lowe created the foundation in 1985 to "champion the entrepreneurial spirit" as a cornerstone of the free enterprise system. As an operating foundation, the Edward Lowe Foundation does not provide grants. Instead, it creates and administers programs that deliver information and educational activities to help second-stage entrepreneurs take their companies to the next level. Among the foundation's programs are CEO PeerSpectivesTM roundtables and leadership retreats. More information is available at www.lowe.org.

Copyright 2007. The James J. Hill Reference Library. All rights reserved.
80 West Fourth Street, St. Paul, MN 55102 | 651.265.5500 | www.jjhill.org

 

Workforce Developments – New Paradigm for Recruiting

Precision Manufacturing, p 13– Debra Bultnick – DEED Manufacturing Industry Liaison

 

Workforce Development for precision manufacturers was the topic of the National Tooling and Machining Association (NTMA) Annual Convention held in early February.  Manufacturers from Minnesota and across the country assembled to discuss and discover best practices in recruiting, retaining, educating  and training new and incumbent workers.

 

Manufacturers from all regions bemoaned the lack of qualified workers, and while I can offer no titanium bullet, I offer the following strategy:  Select, Recruit, Train.

 

The approach for effectively recruiting workers has changed and the employees you need to find are anywhere---but not everywhere.  The days of running an ad in the paper (read by thousands, responded to by as many as a hundred from which perhaps ten resumes are considered, four interviewed, one hired) are waning as are the number of available workers declines.  The tendency for some employers it to cast a wider net in an attempt to keep the funnel full at the top.  Using hundreds of temp workers to find those that can be a permanent asset is costly.  One manufacturer spent nearly a million dollars with a temp service last year and gained just two permanent employees.  Spending five hundred thousand dollars per hire is not a sustainable model!

 

The new paradigm for recruiting, retaining, and advancing a workforce requires a targeted approach.  It begins by asking the right questions:

·        How do you identify characteristics and skills needed by job candidates?

·        How do you manage effective career progression for all employees?

·        How do employee education and training contribute to achieving business results goals?

·        How do you organize and manage work and jobs to promote cooperation and ensure knowledge transfer.

·        How do you accomplish effective succession planning for leadership and management positions?

 

Wrestling with these questions will allow you to target your recruiting efforts and dollars for new hires and incumbent worker advancement.  You’ll know exactly what you need in an employee, and exactly how your work systems function to cultivate that employee.  The new strategy is selective recruitment.

 

You can see the work ethic, habits and competencies of your potential new hire everywhere you go.  You can observe them at their current job and can make assessments about their fit into your organization.  Is the bagboy at your grocer a sharp kid?  Does the night manager at the corner convenience store consistently deliver customer service?  Who is the most industrious at the detail car wash?  Who at the full service gas station?  Now your recruiting lens is focused on fewer, yet more likely prospects from the broader spectrum of the labor pool.  The same holds true as you evaluate who on your front line can move into higher levels of responsibility and management.

 

Follow the methodology contained in your responses to the questions posed earlier to determine an internal or external candidate’s employability in your organization.  Where there is a gap in skills and education, provide support and resources.  Target training for immediate needs and plan training for future needs.  Make ongoing training the bedrock of employee recruitment and retention.  Instill in your workforce culture that ongoing training will be supported by you, and that the responsibility lies with each employee to advance and enhance their own career options within your organization.  The smaller your workforce, the larger looms this necessity.  Instead of competing for machinists, you can find people to train as machinists.

 

Training and development can come from traditional sources such as your community college or state university, from online instruction like that of Tooling U, and from structured on-the-job training and apprenticeships.  Look for training offered by industry associations, community education programs, regional WorkForce Centers and the U of M Extension Services.

 

Some of  Minnesota’s own solutions for recruiting and training will be showcased at this year’s Grand View, April 18-20.  These best practices include those provided by State-funded programs, in the K-12 education system, and those to address immediate training needs.  Find out how you can put these programs to work as part of your new strategy of select, recruit and train.

 

New Federal Compliance

Web Site

There is now a single Website that business owners can visit for all their federal compliance information.  The site, www.business.gov , will search for compliance news, information and federal forms from nearly 100 government Web site, and compile government compliance contact information.  The site was officially revamped and relaunched in October.

The site contains keyword, industry and topic-specific compliance searches, includes all federal forms from www.forms.gov and lists compliance contracts from government agencies.  The U.S. Small Business Administration in partnership with 21 federal agencies manages the Web site.

 

States Take on E-Waste Problem
Source: GreenBiz.com

SAN JOSE, Calif., Feb. 26, 2007 -- Bills to solve the problem of what do to with the mounting piles of electronic waste are already under consideration in 21 state legislatures, plus the city of New York. Bills are expected to be introduced soon in at least three more states, meaning that half of the U.S. states are currently actively trying to solve the e-waste problem in some way.

Electronic waste is a major problem across the country, especially as technology becomes cheaper to produce, and thus more "disposable." The EPA estimates that of the 2.63 million tons of electronic waste that was disposed of in 2005, only 12.5 percent of it, or 330,000 pounds, was recovered for recycling. The other 87.5 percent ended up in landfills or incinerators.

The Computer Take Back Campaign estimates that more than 315 million computers will soon become obsolete, and may be destined for landfills. Those computers alone contain a total of more than 1.2 billion pounds of lead. About 40% of the heavy metals, including lead, mercury and cadmium, in landfills come from electronic equipment discards.

The most controversial issue facing state policymakers in dealing with e-waste is deciding whether manufacturers or consumers will pay for e-waste recycling programs. Four states have already passed laws to create e-waste recycling programs: Maine, Maryland, California, and Washington State. Three of them created "producer responsibility" programs, mandating that the manufacturers pay for collection and recycling e-waste.

Only California has passed a law charging consumer fees, called "Advanced Recycling Fees," or ARFs, at the time products are purchased. While producer responsibility advocates acknowledge that consumers ultimately pay under either approach, they assert that producer-financed takeback programs can leverage design changes, making electronics more recyclable and less toxic.

Of the 21 states/cities with bills pending, 15 of them have introduced producer responsibility bills: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland (where the bill would expand an existing program), Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, and New York City. Four of these states have also introduced ARF bills: Hawaii, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and New Jersey.

Robin Schneider, Vice-Chair of the Computer TakeBack Campaign, said, "We see the momentum swinging strongly in favor of the producer responsibility solution in the states. We support this approach because it meets two important goals -- making more recycling happen, and giving the manufacturers an incentive to make their products less toxic and more recyclable. If we don't address both goals, then we are not solving the problem."

There are recent signs that industry support is dwindling for charging consumers for e-waste recycling. Samsung and IBM recently withdrew from a coalition of television companies who lobby against producer responsibility bills, and in favor of ARF bills. Calling itself the "Electronics Manufacturers Coalition for Responsible Recycling," the coalition is lead by Panasonic, Sharp, and Philips. IBM testified at a committee hearing in favor of the producer responsibility bill in Minnesota last Thursday, where in the past they have opposed the same language.

"We are glad to see that Samsung and IBM have withdrawn from the ARF coalition," said Sheila Dormody, Director of Clean Water Action, Rhode Island. "Next, we'd like to see Sony and LG take the same step, to join with Dell and HP and show consumers that they are responsible companies who want to promote producer takeback, not fight it."

Minnesota Ends Calendar Year With Strongest Job Growth Since 1999
~ Labor Force Participation Jumps to Highest Level in 20 Months ~

         

January 16, 2007

ST. PAUL — Minnesota’s labor markets closed out the calendar year with 54,580 more jobs than at the end of 2005, the strongest job growth since 1999. The state’s annual employment growth rate of 2 percent again outpaced the national rate of 1.4 percent.

Minnesota added 13,000 jobs in the final quarter of 2006, despite a modest setback in December when the state lost 1,600 jobs and a downward revision of November’s gains, according to figures released today by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED).

Labor force participation surged in the second half of 2006, reaching 74 percent in December, the highest level in 20 months. Since June, 54,000 people either took jobs or started looking for work. Despite the overall strength of the labor market in 2006, the market did not fully absorb these new participants, and the December unemployment rate rose to 4.2 percent, up from 3.9 percent in November.

“Minnesota closed out 2006 with solid over-the-year job growth and an unemployment rate that reflects a healthy surge in our labor force participation rate,” DEED Commissioner Dan McElroy said. “Our state’s economy continues to outperform the national economy in most areas, particularly in high-paying professional careers.”

 

 

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

 

Unemployment Rate

December 2006

November 2006

 

MN

4.2 percent

3.9 percent

 

US

 4.5 percent

4.5 percent

 

 

 

NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

 

Employment

December 2006

November 2006

Dec. '05-Dec. '06
Level Change

Dec. '05-Dec. '06
Percent Change

 

MN

2,785,000

2,786,600

54,600

2.0 percent

 

US

136,214,000

136,047,000

1,894,000

  1.4 percent

 

 

Inventrepreneur Program

Multi-session, hands-on course that puts a realistic perspective on the inventing process not usually addressed in seminars.  The class is designed to help innovators evaluate their new product and business concept before they spend their hard-earned money.   May 9, 16,23 & 30, June 6.

LEARN:  concept analysis, competitive product research; market research; product development; value analysis; sales and distribution; licensing; venturing; protection; the Harvest

5 sessions, 3 hours each, 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.  The class will be delivered via ITV between the Red Wing and Winona Campuses.

ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR:
Bill Baker is the Director of the Academy for Innovation, located in Stillwater, MN, and the founder of the Twin Cities Inventors' Network.  He is also a charter member of the Minnesota Board of Invention and a recent board member in the United Inventors Association USA.

Contact Robert Nilsson of MN State College Custom Training:  Phone:  (Winona) 507-453-2740  or  (Red Wing) 651-385-6326 Email: customtraining@southeastmn.edu

 

Revisions to the EEO-1 Report

Background and Basic Requirements

From http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/qanda.html

1.      Q: What is the EEO-1 Report?

A: The EEO-1 Report – formally known as the "Employer Information Report" – is a government form requiring many employers to provide a count of their employees by job category and then by ethnicity, race and gender. The EEO-1 report is submitted to both the EEOC and the Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

2.      Q: Who must file the EEO-1 report?

A: The EEO-1 report must be filed by:

o        Employers with federal government contracts of $50,000 or more and 50 or more employees; and

o        Employers who do not have a federal government contract but have 100 or more employees

3.      Q: When must the EEO-1 report be filed?

A: The EEO-1 report must be filed annually with the EEOC by September 30. It must use employment numbers from any pay period in July through September of that year.

4.      Q: When must employers begin using the revised EEO-1 report?

A: The revised EEO-1 report must be used beginning with the survey due by September 30, 2007. For the surveys due by September 2006, employers should continue to use the EEO-1 report format from previous years. This report is still available on the EEOC’s website at https://apps.eeoc.gov/eeo1/eeo1.jsp

5.      Q: How do employers file EEO-1 reports?

A: We strongly recommend that EEO-1 reports be submitted through the EEO-1 Online Filing System or as an electronically transmitted data file. Paper EEO-1 forms will be generated on request only, and only in extreme cases where Internet access is not available to the employer. Instructions on how to file are available on the EEOC’s website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1survey/howtofile.html.

6.      Q: Is EEO-1 data confidential?

A: Yes. The Commission is required by law to keep individual employer EEO‑1 reports strictly confidential. 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(e).

7.      Q: Where can employers find more information about the EEO-1?

A: General information about the EEO-1 can be found at the EEOC’s website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1survey/index.html.

Description of the Changes to the New EEO-1 Report

8.      Q: What changes are being made to the ethnic and racial categories on the EEO-1 report?

A: A number of changes are being made to the race and ethnic categories. The revised EEO-1 report:

o        adds a new category titled "Two or more races"

o        divides "Asian or Pacific Islander" into two separate categories: "Asian" and "Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander"

o        renames "Black" as "Black or African American"

o        renames "Hispanic" as "Hispanic or Latino"

o        strongly endorses self-identification of race and ethnic categories, as opposed to visual identification by employers

9.      Q: What changes are being made to the job categories on the EEO-1 report?

A: First, the current category of "Officials and Managers" will be divided into two levels based on responsibility and influence within the organization.

These two levels will be:

              1.         Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers (plan, direct and    formulate policy, set strategy and provide overall direction; in larger organizations, within two reporting levels of CEO)

2.      First/Mid-Level Officials and Managers (direct implementation or operations within specific parameters set by Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers; oversee day-to-day operations)

The revised EEO-1 also will move business and financial occupations from the Officials and Managers category to the Professionals category (to improve data for analyzing trends in mobility of minorities and women within Officials and Managers).

10.  Q: What process did the EEOC follow in adopting these revisions to the EEO-1 report?

A: On June 11, 2003, the EEOC published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed revisions to the EEO-1 and asked for comments in 60 days.

0.                  Thirty-two interested parties, including employers, civil rights organizations, human resources and information technology professionals, and other individuals, submitted written comments.

1.      The EEOC held a public hearing at which nine witnesses testified. The record was completed by several written comments submitted subsequent to the hearing.

2.      The EEOC reviewed the comments and made revisions to the EEO-1 report, in coordination with OFCCP.

3.      On November 16, 2005, the Commission voted to approve the revisions to the EEO-1 Report. A final Notice of Submission for Office of Management Budget (OMB) review was published in the Federal Register on November 28, 2005. This notice is available on the Commission's website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html.

4.      After a 30-day public comment period during which OMB considered all comments submitted, the revised EEO-1 was given final approval.

5.      The final revised EEO-1 report was posted on the Commission's website on January 27, 2006 at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html.

11.  Q: Where is more information about the revisions to the EEO-1?

A: More information about the revised EEO-1 - including the final Notice of Submission for OMB Review which explains the revisions in detail and the Instruction Booklet - is available on the Commission's website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html . A copy of the final notice can also be found in the November 28, 2005 issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 71294) at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-23359.htm .

Uses of EEO-1 Data

12.  Q: What do the EEOC and OFCCP do with the EEO-1 survey data?

A: Both the EEOC and OFCCP have used the EEO-1 since 1966.

The EEOC uses the data to support civil rights enforcement. The EEOC also uses the data to analyze employment patterns, such as the representation of female and minority workers within companies, industries, or regions.

OFCCP uses EEO-1 data to determine which employer facilities to select for compliance evaluations. OFCCP’s system uses statistical assessment of EEO-1 data to select facilities where the likelihood of systematic discrimination is the greatest.

Next Steps

13.  Q: What happens now that OMB has approved the revised EEO-1 report?

A: The final EEO-1 report has been posted on the Commission's website, with the valid OMB number, at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html, along with the Instruction Booklet. Employers must begin to use the newly approved EEO-1 report beginning with the survey due September 30, 2007. (For the survey due September 30, 2006, employers should continue to use the EEO-1 report from previous years, still available on the Commission's website at https://apps.eeoc.gov/eeo1/eeo1.jsp.)

Minnesota Job Vacancy Survey

4th Quarter 2006                      

 For complete information go to:       http://www.deed.state.mn.us/lmi/publications/jobvacancy/4Q06.htm

 
Comparison to Previous Job Vacancy Surveys
Workforce Supply and Demand Indicators

Summary of Major Findings

Job vacancies declined in the fourth quarter of 2006, down 9 percent from one year ago, to 55,250.  Over the year, increases in the Educational Services, Finance and Insurance, and Transportation and Warehousing industries could not overcome decreases in the Construction, Healthcare, and Public Administration industries.

Figure 1: Job Vacancies in Minnesota by Quarter

These 55,250 job vacancies translate into a job vacancy rate of 2.1 percent—or 2.1 job vacancies for every 100 filled positions—in Minnesota.  This was slightly down from the vacancy rate of 2.5 percent one year ago.   During fourth quarter 2006, we estimate that there were 5.0 job vacancies for every 10.0 unemployed people statewide.  One year ago, there were about 5.7 job vacancies for every 10.0 unemployed people in Minnesota.

Almost two-thirds of all job vacancies, 35,580, are located in the Twin Cities seven-county area while the remaining 19,670 are in Greater Minnesota.  Greater Minnesota has a job vacancy rate of 1.9 percent while the Twin Cities job vacancy rate is 2.3 percent.  Compared to one year ago, the number of job vacancies fell in both Greater Minnesota (by 13 percent) and the Twin Cities (by 7 percent).

Higher than average job vacancy rates persist in some occupations.   Four occupational groups show evidence of having the greatest need for workers based on a combination of the number of job vacancies, the job vacancy rate and the hiring demand index (a calculation that controls for turnover in the occupational group).  These are:

  • computer and mathematical occupations (including computer programmers and actuaries);
  • healthcare practitioners and technical occupations (including registered nurses and technicians);
  • healthcare support occupations (including nursing aides and home health aides); and
  • sales and related occupations (including retail salespersons and specialized sales agents and sales representatives).

The Healthcare sector continues to have the greatest share of job vacancies although its job vacancy rate has declined from 3.2 percent one year go to 2.8 percent during fourth quarter 2006.  Job vacancies in other industries, especially Retail Trade, Manufacturing and Accommodation and Food Service also have a high share of job vacancies statewide. 

 Figure 2: MN Job Vacancies by Industrial Division

Firms with fewer than 50 employees account for 40 percent of total job vacancies. Despite this, very small (1 to 4 employess) and small (5 to 49 employees) firms have a slightly higher-than-average job vacancy rate of 2.2 percent and combined have more job vacancies (21,900 openings) than the other firm size classes individually.

This report provides information on characteristics associated with the job vacancies including education and experience requirements, starting wage and benefit offers, and whether job vacancies are temporary or seasonal, and part- or full-time.  Some key characteristics of job vacancies in fourth quarter 2006 are as follows:

  • Sixty percent of vacancies are for a full-time job; 40 percent are for part-time opportunities.
  • Twelve percent are for temporary or seasonal positions.
  • Thirty-five percent of openings require a high school diploma but no education beyond that.  Fourty percent require some level of post-secondary education or training.
  • Thirty-nine percent call for experience related to the position.
  • The median (50th percentile) wage offer for all job vacancies is $10.00 per hour.  Wage offers are highly correlated with experience and education requirements.
  • In terms of benefits associated with the openings, 64 percent of vacancies offer health insurance, 64 percent offer some form of paid time off, and 59 percent offer retirement plans.  Benefits are less common for part-time job vacancies than for full-time job vacancies.

Over-the-Year Change in Job Vacancy Levels

Table 1-1
(download the MS Excel file)

Comparison of 4Q 2006 to 4Q 2005 by Occupational Group

 

Minnesota

Greater Minnesota

Twin Cities

Major Occupational Group

Percent
Change

Numeric
Change

Percent
Change

Numeric
Change

Percent
Change

Numeric
Change

Architecture and Engineering

-8.9% 

-127 

-18.6% 

   -80 

-4.7% 

-47 

Art, Design, Entertainment, and Media

51.4% 

373 

39.7% 

94 

57.2% 

279 

Building Cleaning and Grounds Maintenance

-15.2% 

-190 

-18.7% 

-134 

-10.5% 

-56 

Business and Financial Operations

-12.9% 

-441 

-57.4% 

-431 

-0.4% 

-10 

Community and Social Services

-18.1% 

-188 

-24.1% 

-89 

-14.8% 

-99 

Computer and Mathematical

33.0% 

627 

48.6% 

125 

30.6% 

502 

Construction and Extraction

-49.5% 

-807 

-45.1% 

-564 

-63.9% 

-243 

Education, Training, and Library

-6.2% 

-107 

-39.0% 

-279 

16.8% 

172 

Farming, Fishing, and Forestry

>100% 

329 

>100% 

321 

NR 

NR 

Food Preparation and Serving Related

-18.6% 

-1,233 

-29.3% 

-950 

-8.4% 

-283 

Healthcare Practitioners and Technical

-3.4% 

-171 

3.9% 

68 

-7.3% 

-239 

Healthcare Support

-17.8% 

-752 

-18.2% 

-381 

-17.3% 

-371 

Installation, Maintenance, and Repair

-61.1% 

-1,298 

-58.0% 

-497 

-63.3% 

-801 

Legal

-22.5% 

-29 

NR 

NR 

-24.8% 

-31 

Life, Physical, and Social Sciences

39.0% 

180 

>100% 

80 

24.6% 

100 

Management

-25.9% 

-760 

-13.2% 

-55 

-27.9% 

-703 

Office and Administration Support

20.9% 

1,277 

-5.7% 

-109 

33.0% 

1,386 

Personal Care and Services

-42.6% 

-960 

-34.3% 

-331 

-48.9% 

-629 

Production

-26.4% 

-1,203 

-30.0% 

-732 

-22.2% 

-471 

Protective Services

-56.2% 

-651 

29.0% 

31 

-64.9% 

-682 

Sales and Related

10.3% 

857 

34.5% 

778 

1.3% 

79 

Transportation and Material Moving

-11.4% 

-434 

14.3% 

239 

-31.6% 

-673 

Total

-9.4% 

-5,706 

-12.8% 

-2,894 

-7.3% 

-2,812 

NR=Data are not reportable due to failure to meet reliability standards.

  • Office and administrative support occupations gained the most job vacancies over the year, up by 1,280.
  • Other occupational groups that also saw over-the-year increases in job vacancies include sales and related and computer and mathematical occupations.
  • Occupational groups which experienced a significant decline in job vacancies compared to one year ago include installation, maintenance, and repair; food preparation and serving related; and production.

Table 1-2
(download the MS Excel file)

Comparison of 4Q 2006 to 4Q 2005 by Industrial Division

 

Minnesota

Greater Minnesota

Twin Cities

Industrial Division

Percent
Change

Numeric
Change

Percent
Change

Numeric
Change

Percent
Change

Numeric
Change

Accommodation

-12.7% 

-878 

-22.2% 

-673 

-5.3% 

-205 

Administrative and Support

-22.6% 

-534 

2.2% 

13 

-30.6% 

-547 

Agriculture

>100% 

410 

>100% 

408 

NR 

NR 

Arts and Entertainment

5.2% 

76 

36.7% 

225 

-17.6% 

-149 

Construction

-66.6% 

-1,602 

-42.7% 

-472 

-87.0% 

-1,130 

Educational Services

27.1% 

598 

-18.3% 

-157 

55.9% 

755 

Finance and Insurance

11.9% 

444 

-19.8% 

-177 

22.0% 

621 

Healthcare

-11.3% 

-1,311 

-15.3% 

-758 

-8.3% 

-553 

Information

-7.5% 

-119 

-13.6% 

-52 

-5.6% 

-67 

Management

-2.4% 

-33 

>100% 

231 

-19.5% 

-264 

Manufacturing

-11.9% 

-824 

-27.2% 

-871 

1.3% 

47 

Mining

-22.1%