|
 |
WinonaWorkForceCenter
LINKS
April 2007 |
 |
|
The New Minnesota Job Bank (MJB) |
|
|
|
Director's
Insight
A
Bonnie
Elsey
March 1, 2007 Volume 1, Issue 3 Workforce Development
Division from Director |
|
The final development stages of the new Minnesota Job
Bank (MJB) are underway, and it's time to get excited about the launch of
this powerful new recruiting system. According to our current
projections, testing of the new MJB will began in mid April, and the
system will go live in June.
For those of you who use MJB, the new MJB will be a
real treat for you. We absolutely had to improve the match between job
seekers and employers, and needed to utilize technology that can do this
automatically. Today’s technology allows us to make better matches on
multiple criteria at one time. We also needed to make it easier for
employers to post job orders and for job seekers to post resumes.
DEED had an ambitious list of improvements, and we selected a product
called LENS™ to be the "match engine" for the new MJB. Developed by a
California company called Burning Glass, LENS™ is a state-of-the-art tool
for matching resumes and job orders.
LENS™ is an "intelligent" search engine that does more than match key
words but searches in context with multiple criteria to find the best
candidates. For example, when an employer views a list of matched
resumes, LENS™ ranks the resumes in order of most to least qualified. It
also uses its “intelligence” to automatically code job orders and resumes,
saving staff time and increasing accuracy while allowing for better labor
market information.
One of the most exciting features of LENS™ is its ability to identify
alternative careers for job seekers by "reading" the resume and suggesting
other careers! Rather than looking only at skills, LENS™ analyzes complex
behavioral patterns in resumes, and uses those patterns to build
predictive models for employment. LENS can find job openings that require
similar skills, job openings that resemble the candidate’s most recent
job, and job openings that others with similar career paths have
successfully migrated to. This will be an outstanding tool for our job
seeking customers.
In addition to these new features, the new MJB will
be easier to use for employers and job seekers. The system is intuitive,
and will offer help at the point of need. The process for entering and
editing resumes and job orders has been shortened and simplified. Job
orders and resumes can be easily uploaded into the system so less time is
spent on manually entering data.
DEED’s goal is to make MJB the primary recruiting
service in Minnesota for employers and government and could increase
employee retention by providing better candidates. Job seekers will be
delighted to find job opportunities they may not have considered.
What a premier tool for citizens of Minnesota!
You don’t have to wait much longer! |
|
New
Online Resource Offers 'Just-in-Time' Solutions to Help Start-ups Take
Off, Growing Companies to Soar |
|
|
Biz Info Library is
the source for best practice articles and
practical, proven small business/entrepreneur solutions
ST.
PAUL, MINN. - February 23, 2007
- Tired of search
engines returning millions of results on business terms such as "cash
flow" or "marketing?" Small businesses and entrepreneurs now have a
solution. A powerful new online resource, the Biz Info Library (www.bizinfolibrary.org),
provides immediate access to reliable expert information, ideas and
insights on owning, operating, and growing a company.
Launched on Feb. 27
during national EntrepreneurshipWeek USA, the Biz Info Library is an
online collection of articles featuring practical, results-focused
information. Along with some of the top publishers on small business and
entrepreneurial success, content providers include world-renowned authors
and leading business experts.
"There's too much
information about entrepreneurship out there, so it's difficult and
time-consuming to determine what, and who to believe," said venture
capitalist and blogger Guy Kawasaki, author of the best-selling "The Art
of the Start" and an article contributor to the Biz Info Library. "What's
needed is a vertical search engine for entrepreneurs and The Biz Info
Library delivers on this need."
Biz Info Library
eliminates frustrating online searches that produce thousands and
sometimes millions of results. Users can quickly find relevant information
by using either a keyword search, an advanced search, or by reviewing all
articles in a particular category and subcategory.
Biz Info Library
provides specific, just-in-time information that guides problem-solving
and decision-making day-to-day and long term. Users can quickly find
specific information and practical business solutions related to their
current business issues. Users can download articles, and can even save
articles online to create a custom library.
"As a small business
owner, you're expected to be an expert on everything from your product or
service to human resources, marketing and finance," said New York Times #1
best selling business author, world-famous speaker, and Biz Info Library
content contributor Harvey Mackay. "The Biz Info Library is the go-to
resource for practical solutions and applicable strategies for individuals
and organizations seeking to be winners in an ever-changing, always
competitive marketplace."
"One of the
challenges small businesses face is finding information on topics such as
marketing," added Sabrina Parsons, director of marketing at Palo Alto
Software, the world's premier business planning software company and a Biz
Info Library article contributor. "The Biz Info Library solves that
problem and helps people get the information they need to make immediate
and valuable improvements in their business."
Biz Info Library's
extensive collection of articles and information are not easily accessible
or available anywhere else. Each day Biz Info Library's experienced
editors add content reviewed by expert advisors at the James J. Hill
Reference Library to ensure accuracy and timeliness. The Hill Library is
considered the nation's premier source for publicly accessible practical
business information, and the Biz Info Library is built on the Hill
Library's proprietary content management technology platform.
"In a traditional
library, you don't get every book ever written about a specific topic,"
said Hill Library president Sam Richter. "Rather, you get the best of the
best as reviewed and selected by a professional. If you use the Biz Info
Library, you'll save a tremendous amount of time, and you'll get only the
best business information as written by proven business experts."
Biz Info Library is
a collaborative effort of three leading not-for-profit organizations whose
missions emphasize support for entrepreneurship and small business: The
James J. Hill Reference Library, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and
the Edward Lowe Foundation. Administered by the Hill Library, Biz Info
Library is free to all users. Sponsorships and custom-branded versions of
the Biz Info Library are available. |
|
◊◊◊◊◊ |
|
About The James J.
Hill Reference Library
Founded in 1921, The
James J. Hill Library is a non-profit, private business research
organization, located in
St. Paul,
Minn.
It is considered the nation's premier source for publicly accessible
practical business information. Through its walk-in service, online
products, educational programs and professional services, the Hill Library
helps people achieve their business dreams by providing access to the best
informational resources and expert reference assistance. For more
information, visit
www.jjhill.org.
About the Ewing
Marion Kauffman Foundation
The Ewing Marion
Kauffman Foundation of
Kansas City
is a private, nonpartisan foundation that works with partners to advance
entrepreneurship in America and improve the education of children and
youth. The Kauffman Foundation was established in the mid-1960s by the
late entrepreneur and philanthropist Ewing Kauffman. Information about the
Kauffman Foundation is available at
www.kauffman.org.
About the Edward
Lowe Foundation
Edward and Darlene
Lowe created the foundation in 1985 to "champion the entrepreneurial
spirit" as a cornerstone of the free enterprise system. As an operating
foundation, the Edward Lowe Foundation does not provide grants. Instead,
it creates and administers programs that deliver information and
educational activities to help second-stage entrepreneurs take their
companies to the next level. Among the foundation's programs are CEO
PeerSpectivesTM roundtables and leadership retreats. More information is
available at
www.lowe.org.
Copyright 2007. The James J. Hill Reference Library. All rights reserved.
80
West Fourth Street,
St. Paul, MN 55102 | 651.265.5500 | www.jjhill.org |
|
Workforce Developments –
New Paradigm for Recruiting
Precision Manufacturing, p
13– Debra Bultnick – DEED Manufacturing Industry Liaison
Workforce Development for
precision manufacturers
was the topic of the National Tooling and Machining Association (NTMA)
Annual Convention held in early February. Manufacturers from Minnesota
and across the country assembled to discuss and discover best practices in
recruiting, retaining, educating and training new and incumbent workers.
Manufacturers from all
regions bemoaned the lack of qualified workers, and while I can offer no
titanium bullet, I offer the following strategy: Select, Recruit, Train.
The approach for
effectively recruiting workers has changed and the employees you need to
find are anywhere---but not everywhere. The days of running an ad in the
paper (read by thousands, responded to by as many as a hundred from which
perhaps ten resumes are considered, four interviewed, one hired) are
waning as are the number of available workers declines. The tendency for
some employers it to cast a wider net in an attempt to keep the funnel
full at the top. Using hundreds of temp workers to find those that can be
a permanent asset is costly. One manufacturer spent nearly a million
dollars with a temp service last year and gained just two permanent
employees. Spending five hundred thousand dollars per hire is not a
sustainable model!
The new paradigm for
recruiting, retaining, and advancing a workforce requires a targeted
approach. It begins by asking the right questions:
·
How do
you identify characteristics and skills needed by job candidates?
·
How do
you manage effective career progression for all employees?
·
How do
employee education and training contribute to achieving business results
goals?
·
How do
you organize and manage work and jobs to promote cooperation and ensure
knowledge transfer.
·
How do
you accomplish effective succession planning for leadership and management
positions?
Wrestling with these
questions will allow you to target your recruiting efforts and dollars for
new hires and incumbent worker advancement. You’ll know exactly what you
need in an employee, and exactly how your work systems function to
cultivate that employee. The new strategy is selective recruitment.
You can see the work
ethic, habits and competencies of your potential new hire everywhere you
go. You can observe them at their current job and can make assessments
about their fit into your organization. Is the bagboy at your grocer a
sharp kid? Does the night manager at the corner convenience store
consistently deliver customer service? Who is the most industrious at the
detail car wash? Who at the full service gas station? Now your
recruiting lens is focused on fewer, yet more likely prospects from the
broader spectrum of the labor pool. The same holds true as you evaluate
who on your front line can move into higher levels of responsibility and
management.
Follow the methodology
contained in your responses to the questions posed earlier to determine an
internal or external candidate’s employability in your organization.
Where there is a gap in skills and education, provide support and
resources. Target training for immediate needs and plan training for
future needs. Make ongoing training the bedrock of employee recruitment
and retention. Instill in your workforce culture that ongoing training
will be supported by you, and that the responsibility lies with each
employee to advance and enhance their own career options within your
organization. The smaller your workforce, the larger looms this
necessity. Instead of competing for machinists, you can find people to
train as machinists.
Training and
development can come from traditional sources such as your community
college or state university, from online instruction like that of Tooling
U, and from structured on-the-job training and apprenticeships. Look for
training offered by industry associations, community education programs,
regional WorkForce Centers and the U of M Extension Services.
Some of Minnesota’s
own solutions for recruiting and training will be showcased at this year’s
Grand View, April 18-20. These best practices include those provided by
State-funded programs, in the K-12 education system, and those to address
immediate training needs. Find out how you can put these programs to work
as part of your new strategy of select, recruit and train. |
|
|
New Federal Compliance
Web Site
There is now a single Website that business owners
can visit for all their federal compliance information. The site,
www.business.gov , will search for compliance news, information and
federal forms from nearly 100 government Web site, and compile government
compliance contact information. The site was officially revamped and
relaunched in October.
The site contains keyword, industry and
topic-specific compliance searches, includes all federal forms from
www.forms.gov and lists compliance contracts from government
agencies. The U.S. Small Business Administration in partnership with 21
federal agencies manages the Web site. |
|
|
|
States
Take on E-Waste Problem
Source:
GreenBiz.com |
|
SAN JOSE, Calif., Feb. 26, 2007
-- Bills to
solve the problem of what do to with the mounting piles of electronic
waste are already under consideration in 21 state legislatures, plus the
city of New York. Bills are expected to be introduced soon in at least
three more states, meaning that half of the U.S. states are currently
actively trying to solve the e-waste problem in some way.
Electronic waste is a major problem across the country, especially as
technology becomes cheaper to produce, and thus more "disposable." The EPA
estimates that of the 2.63 million tons of electronic waste that was
disposed of in 2005, only 12.5 percent of it, or 330,000 pounds, was
recovered for recycling. The other 87.5 percent ended up in landfills or
incinerators.
The Computer Take Back Campaign estimates that more than 315 million
computers will soon become obsolete, and may be destined for landfills.
Those computers alone contain a total of more than 1.2 billion pounds of
lead. About 40% of the heavy metals, including lead, mercury and cadmium,
in landfills come from electronic equipment discards.
The most controversial issue facing state policymakers in dealing with
e-waste is deciding whether manufacturers or consumers will pay for
e-waste recycling programs. Four states have already passed laws to create
e-waste recycling programs: Maine, Maryland, California, and Washington
State. Three of them created "producer responsibility" programs, mandating
that the manufacturers pay for collection and recycling e-waste.
Only California has passed a law charging consumer fees, called "Advanced
Recycling Fees," or ARFs, at the time products are purchased. While
producer responsibility advocates acknowledge that consumers ultimately
pay under either approach, they assert that producer-financed takeback
programs can leverage design changes, making electronics more recyclable
and less toxic.
Of the 21 states/cities with bills pending, 15 of them have introduced
producer responsibility bills: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois,
Massachusetts, Maryland (where the bill would expand an existing program),
Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, and New York City. Four of these states have
also introduced ARF bills: Hawaii, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and New
Jersey.
Robin Schneider, Vice-Chair of the Computer TakeBack Campaign, said, "We
see the momentum swinging strongly in favor of the producer responsibility
solution in the states. We support this approach because it meets two
important goals -- making more recycling happen, and giving the
manufacturers an incentive to make their products less toxic and more
recyclable. If we don't address both goals, then we are not solving the
problem."
There are recent signs that industry support is dwindling for charging
consumers for e-waste recycling. Samsung and IBM recently withdrew from a
coalition of television companies who lobby against producer
responsibility bills, and in favor of ARF bills. Calling itself the
"Electronics Manufacturers Coalition for Responsible Recycling," the
coalition is lead by Panasonic, Sharp, and Philips. IBM testified at a
committee hearing in favor of the producer responsibility bill in
Minnesota last Thursday, where in the past they have opposed the same
language.
"We are glad to see that Samsung and IBM have withdrawn from the ARF
coalition," said Sheila Dormody, Director of Clean Water Action, Rhode
Island. "Next, we'd like to see Sony and LG take the same step, to join
with Dell and HP and show consumers that they are responsible companies
who want to promote producer takeback, not fight it." |
|
|
|
Minnesota Ends
Calendar Year With Strongest Job Growth Since 1999
~ Labor Force Participation
Jumps to Highest Level in 20 Months ~ |
| |
|
|
|
|
January 16, 2007 |
|
ST. PAUL — Minnesota’s
labor markets closed out the calendar year with 54,580 more jobs
than at the end of 2005, the strongest job growth since 1999. The
state’s annual employment growth rate of 2 percent again outpaced
the national rate of 1.4 percent.
Minnesota added 13,000 jobs in the final
quarter of 2006, despite a modest setback in December when the
state lost 1,600 jobs and a downward revision of November’s gains,
according to figures released today by the Minnesota Department of
Employment and Economic Development (DEED).
Labor force participation surged in the
second half of 2006, reaching 74 percent in December, the highest
level in 20 months. Since June, 54,000 people either took jobs or
started looking for work. Despite the overall strength of the
labor market in 2006, the market did not fully absorb these new
participants, and the December unemployment rate rose to 4.2
percent, up from 3.9 percent in November.
“Minnesota closed out 2006 with solid
over-the-year job growth and an unemployment rate that reflects a
healthy surge in our labor force participation rate,” DEED
Commissioner Dan McElroy said. “Our state’s economy continues to
outperform the national economy in most areas, particularly in
high-paying professional careers.”
|
|
|
SEASONALLY ADJUSTED |
|
|
Unemployment Rate |
December 2006 |
November 2006 |
|
|
MN |
4.2
percent |
3.9
percent |
|
|
US |
4.5 percent |
4.5
percent |
|
|
|
|
NOT
SEASONALLY ADJUSTED |
|
|
Employment |
December 2006 |
November 2006 |
Dec. '05-Dec. '06
Level Change |
Dec. '05-Dec. '06
Percent Change |
|
|
MN |
2,785,000 |
2,786,600 |
54,600 |
2.0 percent |
|
|
US |
136,214,000 |
136,047,000 |
1,894,000 |
1.4 percent |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventrepreneur
Program
Multi-session, hands-on course that puts a realistic perspective on the
inventing process not usually addressed in seminars. The class is
designed to help innovators evaluate their new product and business
concept before they spend their hard-earned money. May 9, 16,23 & 30,
June 6.
LEARN: concept
analysis, competitive product research; market research; product
development; value analysis; sales and distribution; licensing; venturing;
protection; the Harvest
5 sessions, 3 hours
each, 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. The class will be delivered via ITV
between the Red Wing and Winona Campuses.
ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR:
Bill Baker is the Director of the Academy for Innovation, located in
Stillwater, MN, and the founder of the Twin Cities Inventors' Network.
He is also a charter member of the Minnesota Board of Invention and a
recent board member in the United Inventors Association USA.
Contact
Robert Nilsson of MN State College Custom Training: Phone: (Winona)
507-453-2740 or (Red Wing) 651-385-6326 Email:
customtraining@southeastmn.edu
|
Revisions to the EEO-1 Report
Background and Basic Requirements
From http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/qanda.html |
|
1.
Q: What is
the EEO-1 Report?
A: The
EEO-1 Report – formally known as the "Employer Information Report" – is a
government form requiring many employers to provide a count of their
employees by job category and then by ethnicity, race and gender. The
EEO-1 report is submitted to both the EEOC and the Department of Labor,
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).
2.
Q: Who must
file the EEO-1 report?
A: The
EEO-1 report must be filed by:
o
Employers
with federal government contracts of $50,000 or more and 50 or more
employees; and
o
Employers
who do not have a federal government contract but have 100 or more
employees
3.
Q: When must
the EEO-1 report be filed?
A: The
EEO-1 report must be filed annually with the EEOC by September 30. It must
use employment numbers from any pay period in July through September of
that year.
4.
Q: When must
employers begin using the revised EEO-1 report?
A: The
revised EEO-1 report must be used beginning with the survey due by
September 30, 2007. For the surveys due by September 2006, employers
should continue to use the EEO-1 report format from previous years. This
report is still available on the EEOC’s website at
https://apps.eeoc.gov/eeo1/eeo1.jsp
5.
Q: How do
employers file EEO-1 reports?
A: We
strongly recommend that EEO-1 reports be submitted through the EEO-1
Online Filing System or as an electronically transmitted data file. Paper
EEO-1 forms will be generated on request only, and only in extreme cases
where Internet access is not available to the employer. Instructions on
how to file are available on the EEOC’s website at
http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1survey/howtofile.html.
6.
Q: Is EEO-1
data confidential?
A: Yes. The
Commission is required by law to keep individual employer EEO‑1 reports
strictly confidential. 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(e).
7.
Q: Where can
employers find more information about the EEO-1?
A: General
information about the EEO-1 can be found at the EEOC’s website at
http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1survey/index.html.
Description of
the Changes to the New EEO-1 Report
8.
Q: What
changes are being made to the ethnic and racial categories on the
EEO-1 report?
A: A number
of changes are being made to the race and ethnic categories. The revised
EEO-1 report:
o
adds a new
category titled "Two or more races"
o
divides
"Asian or Pacific Islander" into two separate categories: "Asian" and
"Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander"
o
renames
"Black" as "Black or African American"
o
renames
"Hispanic" as "Hispanic or Latino"
o
strongly
endorses self-identification of race and ethnic categories, as opposed to
visual identification by employers
9.
Q: What
changes are being made to the job categories on the EEO-1 report?
A: First,
the current category of "Officials and Managers" will be divided into
two levels based on responsibility and influence within the
organization.
These two
levels will be:
1. Executive/Senior
Level Officials and Managers
(plan, direct and formulate policy, set strategy and
provide overall direction; in larger organizations, within two reporting
levels of CEO)
2.
First/Mid-Level Officials and Managers
(direct implementation or operations within specific parameters set by
Executive/Senior Level Officials and Managers; oversee day-to-day
operations)
The revised
EEO-1 also will move business and financial occupations from the Officials
and Managers category to the Professionals category (to improve data for
analyzing trends in mobility of minorities and women within Officials and
Managers).
10.
Q: What
process did the EEOC follow in adopting these revisions to the EEO-1
report?
A: On June
11, 2003, the EEOC published in the
Federal Register a notice
of proposed revisions to the EEO-1 and asked for comments in 60 days.
0.
Thirty-two interested parties, including employers, civil rights
organizations, human resources and information technology professionals,
and other individuals, submitted written comments.
1.
The EEOC held a public hearing at which nine witnesses testified.
The record was completed by several written comments submitted subsequent
to the hearing.
2.
The EEOC reviewed the comments and made revisions to the EEO-1
report, in coordination with OFCCP.
3.
On November 16, 2005, the Commission voted to approve the revisions
to the EEO-1 Report. A final Notice of Submission for Office of Management
Budget (OMB) review was published in the Federal Register on November 28,
2005. This notice is available on the Commission's website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html.
4.
After a 30-day public comment period during which OMB considered
all comments submitted, the revised EEO-1 was given final approval.
5.
The final revised EEO-1 report was posted on the Commission's
website on January 27, 2006 at
http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html.
11.
Q: Where is
more information about the revisions to the EEO-1?
A: More
information about the revised EEO-1 - including the final Notice of
Submission for OMB Review which explains the revisions in detail and the
Instruction Booklet - is available on the Commission's website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html
. A copy of the final notice can also be found in the November 28, 2005
issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 71294) at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-23359.htm
.
Uses of EEO-1
Data
12.
Q: What do
the EEOC and OFCCP do with the EEO-1 survey data?
A: Both the
EEOC and OFCCP have used the EEO-1 since 1966.
The EEOC
uses the data to support civil rights enforcement. The EEOC also uses the
data to analyze employment patterns, such as the representation of female
and minority workers within companies, industries, or regions.
OFCCP uses
EEO-1 data to determine which employer facilities to select for compliance
evaluations. OFCCP’s system uses statistical assessment of EEO-1 data to
select facilities where the likelihood of systematic discrimination is the
greatest.
Next Steps
13.
Q: What
happens now that OMB has approved the revised EEO-1 report?
A: The
final EEO-1 report has been posted on the Commission's website, with the
valid OMB number, at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeo1/index.html, along with the
Instruction Booklet. Employers must begin to use the newly approved EEO-1
report beginning with the survey due September 30, 2007. (For the survey
due September 30, 2006, employers should continue to use the EEO-1 report
from previous years, still available on the Commission's website at
https://apps.eeoc.gov/eeo1/eeo1.jsp.) |
|
|
|
Minnesota Job Vacancy Survey
4th Quarter 2006
For
complete information go to: http://www.deed.state.mn.us/lmi/publications/jobvacancy/4Q06.htm
|
|
|
|
Comparison to Previous Job Vacancy Surveys
Workforce Supply and Demand Indicators
Summary of Major Findings
Job vacancies declined in the fourth quarter of 2006, down
9 percent from one year ago, to 55,250. Over the year, increases in the
Educational Services, Finance and Insurance, and Transportation and
Warehousing industries could not overcome decreases in the Construction,
Healthcare, and Public Administration industries.

These 55,250 job vacancies translate into a job vacancy rate of 2.1
percent—or 2.1 job vacancies for every 100 filled positions—in Minnesota.
This was slightly down from the vacancy rate of 2.5 percent one year
ago. During fourth quarter 2006, we estimate that there were 5.0 job
vacancies for every 10.0 unemployed people statewide. One year ago, there
were about 5.7 job vacancies for every 10.0 unemployed people in
Minnesota.
Almost two-thirds of all job vacancies, 35,580, are located in the Twin
Cities seven-county area while the remaining 19,670 are in Greater
Minnesota. Greater Minnesota has a job vacancy rate of 1.9 percent while
the Twin Cities job vacancy rate is 2.3 percent. Compared to one year
ago, the number of job vacancies fell in both Greater Minnesota (by 13
percent) and the Twin Cities (by 7 percent).
Higher than average job vacancy rates persist in some occupations. Four
occupational groups show evidence of having the greatest need for workers
based on a combination of the number of job vacancies, the job vacancy
rate and the hiring demand index (a calculation that controls for turnover
in the occupational group). These are:
- computer and mathematical occupations (including
computer programmers and actuaries);
- healthcare practitioners and technical occupations
(including registered nurses and technicians);
- healthcare support occupations (including nursing
aides and home health aides); and
- sales and related occupations (including retail
salespersons and specialized sales agents and sales representatives).
The Healthcare sector continues to have the greatest share of job
vacancies although its job vacancy rate has declined from 3.2 percent one
year go to 2.8 percent during fourth quarter 2006. Job vacancies in other
industries, especially Retail Trade, Manufacturing and Accommodation and
Food Service also have a high share of job vacancies statewide.

Firms with fewer than 50 employees account for 40 percent of total job
vacancies. Despite this, very small (1 to 4 employess) and small (5 to 49
employees) firms have a slightly higher-than-average job vacancy rate
of 2.2 percent and combined have more job vacancies (21,900 openings) than
the other firm size classes individually.
This report provides information on characteristics associated with the
job vacancies including education and experience requirements, starting
wage and benefit offers, and whether job vacancies are temporary or
seasonal, and part- or full-time. Some key characteristics of job
vacancies in fourth quarter 2006 are as follows:
- Sixty percent of vacancies are for a full-time
job; 40 percent are for part-time opportunities.
- Twelve percent are for temporary or seasonal
positions.
- Thirty-five percent of openings require a high
school diploma but no education beyond that. Fourty percent require
some level of post-secondary education or training.
- Thirty-nine percent call for experience related to
the position.
- The median (50th percentile) wage offer for all
job vacancies is $10.00 per hour. Wage offers are highly correlated
with experience and education requirements.
- In terms of benefits associated with the openings,
64 percent of vacancies offer health insurance, 64 percent offer some
form of paid time off, and 59 percent offer retirement plans. Benefits
are less common for part-time job vacancies than for full-time job
vacancies.
Over-the-Year Change in Job
Vacancy Levels
|
Table 1-1
(download
the MS Excel file) |
|
Comparison of 4Q 2006 to 4Q 2005 by Occupational Group |
|
|
Minnesota |
Greater Minnesota |
Twin Cities |
|
Major Occupational Group |
Percent
Change |
Numeric
Change |
Percent
Change |
Numeric
Change |
Percent
Change |
Numeric
Change |
|
Architecture and Engineering |
-8.9% |
-127 |
-18.6% |
-80 |
-4.7% |
-47 |
|
Art, Design, Entertainment, and Media |
51.4% |
373 |
39.7% |
94 |
57.2% |
279 |
|
Building Cleaning and Grounds Maintenance |
-15.2% |
-190 |
-18.7% |
-134 |
-10.5% |
-56 |
|
Business and Financial Operations |
-12.9% |
-441 |
-57.4% |
-431 |
-0.4% |
-10 |
|
Community and Social Services |
-18.1% |
-188 |
-24.1% |
-89 |
-14.8% |
-99 |
|
Computer and Mathematical |
33.0% |
627 |
48.6% |
125 |
30.6% |
502 |
|
Construction and Extraction |
-49.5% |
-807 |
-45.1% |
-564 |
-63.9% |
-243 |
|
Education, Training, and Library |
-6.2% |
-107 |
-39.0% |
-279 |
16.8% |
172 |
|
Farming, Fishing, and Forestry |
>100% |
329 |
>100% |
321 |
NR |
NR |
|
Food Preparation and Serving Related |
-18.6% |
-1,233 |
-29.3% |
-950 |
-8.4% |
-283 |
|
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical |
-3.4% |
-171 |
3.9% |
68 |
-7.3% |
-239 |
|
Healthcare Support |
-17.8% |
-752 |
-18.2% |
-381 |
-17.3% |
-371 |
|
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair |
-61.1% |
-1,298 |
-58.0% |
-497 |
-63.3% |
-801 |
|
Legal |
-22.5% |
-29 |
NR |
NR |
-24.8% |
-31 |
|
Life, Physical, and Social Sciences |
39.0% |
180 |
>100% |
80 |
24.6% |
100 |
|
Management |
-25.9% |
-760 |
-13.2% |
-55 |
-27.9% |
-703 |
|
Office and Administration Support |
20.9% |
1,277 |
-5.7% |
-109 |
33.0% |
1,386 |
|
Personal Care and Services |
-42.6% |
-960 |
-34.3% |
-331 |
-48.9% |
-629 |
|
Production |
-26.4% |
-1,203 |
-30.0% |
-732 |
-22.2% |
-471 |
|
Protective Services |
-56.2% |
-651 |
29.0% |
31 |
-64.9% |
-682 |
|
Sales and Related |
10.3% |
857 |
34.5% |
778 |
1.3% |
79 |
|
Transportation and Material Moving |
-11.4% |
-434 |
14.3% |
239 |
-31.6% |
-673 |
|
Total |
-9.4% |
-5,706 |
-12.8% |
-2,894 |
-7.3% |
-2,812 |
|
NR=Data are not reportable due to failure to meet
reliability standards. |
- Office and administrative support
occupations gained the most job vacancies over the year, up by 1,280.
- Other occupational groups that also saw
over-the-year increases in job vacancies include sales and related
and computer and mathematical occupations.
- Occupational groups which experienced a
significant decline in job vacancies compared to one year ago include
installation, maintenance, and repair; food preparation and serving
related; and production.
|
Table 1-2
(download
the MS Excel file) |
|
Comparison of 4Q 2006 to 4Q 2005 by Industrial Division |
|
|
Minnesota |
Greater Minnesota |
Twin Cities |
|
Industrial Division |
Percent
Change |
Numeric
Change |
Percent
Change |
Numeric
Change |
Percent
Change |
Numeric
Change |
|
Accommodation |
-12.7% |
-878 |
-22.2% |
-673 |
-5.3% |
-205 |
|
Administrative and Support |
-22.6% |
-534 |
2.2% |
13 |
-30.6% |
-547 |
|
Agriculture |
>100% |
410 |
>100% |
408 |
NR |
NR |
|
Arts and Entertainment |
5.2% |
76 |
36.7% |
225 |
-17.6% |
-149 |
|
Construction |
-66.6% |
-1,602 |
-42.7% |
-472 |
-87.0% |
-1,130 |
|
Educational Services |
27.1% |
598 |
-18.3% |
-157 |
55.9% |
755 |
|
Finance and Insurance |
11.9% |
444 |
-19.8% |
-177 |
22.0% |
621 |
|
Healthcare |
-11.3% |
-1,311 |
-15.3% |
-758 |
-8.3% |
-553 |
|
Information |
-7.5% |
-119 |
-13.6% |
-52 |
-5.6% |
-67 |
|
Management |
-2.4% |
-33 |
>100% |
231 |
-19.5% |
-264 |
|
Manufacturing |
-11.9% |
-824 |
-27.2% |
-871 |
1.3% |
47 |
|
Mining |
-22.1% |
| | |